The Problematic of the History
The History in itself despises the historic facts it imposes to us.
This is the consequence of the human being representation that shapes it, as to confer to, what he has premeditated in its mind. From one historian to another, both from the same contemporary epoch, their stories although demonstratives as they show on the same event are so different and do not delineate the History in its context as it comes to us. No one could really validate or invalidate the history as testimony of our existence in this earthly world.
More often, it happens that we take actions; these actions may be positive or negative it depends on how our alter ego considers them of good or evil. Sometimes in our breathing space, we are bewildered and isolated with no way out. Willing to strive to find out solution, we unfalteringly put our hands in the dough and at the end, we no longer know where to bend over. Life thus becomes difficult to elucidate even more that our mind is limited to weigh up the outlay of the matter.
How then a profane might integrate himself into this world to write down his name onto the History record? Before bringing out a kind of answer to this issue, it will be attractive to grapple with the philosophical thought of Jean Paul Sartre who defines mankind by his actions... but we must avoid to fall into his proper trap because, according to him, Mankind must be inspired by existentialist ethics… in other words doing action you should think at it well and while thinking, you should assume the full responsibility of the consequences that this may lead to. Mankind in the momentum is sure to write down its name onto the History record and thus becomes himself the depositary of the successive events that characterized his epoch.
It happens sometimes that we make and commit mistakes. Indeed, these mistakes are insignificant in our eyes but remain in regard of the History, indelibly mark that no one, as apostolic, Christian or Muslim can clean it to clean his history. Hitler and Mussolini were right in their time but the course of history came to show the contrary. This can only define a characteristic of our observation. However, in the 21st Century, is it again possible to circumscribe them in our history?
A sequestrated generation can only define its own way which is nothing other than a declaration of its existence. It is clear that no one can stand for himself; it needs as to vegetable yams fiber, a support. This support refers to others: the ego and to close, the alter ego. That’s why in our life, we must reserve a quota of faith to measure our service and our servitude to reach the pantheon of our History, our record-honors. That is where it’s our history.
At the time when the September 11, 2001 empowers the fight against terrorists, the world gave reasons for such country’s leaders as Bush to tracking terrorists. Basically ignorance took precedence over all, because it was at that real time that the entire world legitimized the hunt for witches which victims where poor countries fighting for their peace and sovereignty. Iraq as well as Afghanistan was under tracks. But today, there is no indication that the terrorists were hunted and captured or that Bin Laden and the Taliban are out of terrorism.
Ironically and as the reality usually comes late, the result nowadays is still a counterfeit as in the case of Captain Dreyfus that the French State hundred years later, recognized his innocence since he was convicted.
The history is proving that the real terrorists have been George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Ariel Sharon, and Ehud Olmert who peacefully are enjoying the rest of their life without being harassed or pursued to the International criminal court which is actually devoted for Africans and the poorest leaders of the third world whose for some, seek for freedom and autonomy for their people.
The history rather than being story of the real fact describing what had happened before us, what is happening at the time we are, is a weapon to draw world maps as shaped by the conquistadors and the imperialists.
History is not a victory upon knowledge for real causes, events and realities witnessing the existence on this earth. It is a counterfeit, a crime against knowledge, a dehumanization of the human being species. As science, it is a war against civilization, a conflict of existence opposing falsification of the reality and real testimony.
The History in itself despises the historic facts it imposes to us.
This is the consequence of the human being representation that shapes it, as to confer to, what he has premeditated in its mind. From one historian to another, both from the same contemporary epoch, their stories although demonstratives as they show on the same event are so different and do not delineate the History in its context as it comes to us. No one could really validate or invalidate the history as testimony of our existence in this earthly world.
More often, it happens that we take actions; these actions may be positive or negative it depends on how our alter ego considers them of good or evil. Sometimes in our breathing space, we are bewildered and isolated with no way out. Willing to strive to find out solution, we unfalteringly put our hands in the dough and at the end, we no longer know where to bend over. Life thus becomes difficult to elucidate even more that our mind is limited to weigh up the outlay of the matter.
How then a profane might integrate himself into this world to write down his name onto the History record? Before bringing out a kind of answer to this issue, it will be attractive to grapple with the philosophical thought of Jean Paul Sartre who defines mankind by his actions... but we must avoid to fall into his proper trap because, according to him, Mankind must be inspired by existentialist ethics… in other words doing action you should think at it well and while thinking, you should assume the full responsibility of the consequences that this may lead to. Mankind in the momentum is sure to write down its name onto the History record and thus becomes himself the depositary of the successive events that characterized his epoch.
It happens sometimes that we make and commit mistakes. Indeed, these mistakes are insignificant in our eyes but remain in regard of the History, indelibly mark that no one, as apostolic, Christian or Muslim can clean it to clean his history. Hitler and Mussolini were right in their time but the course of history came to show the contrary. This can only define a characteristic of our observation. However, in the 21st Century, is it again possible to circumscribe them in our history?
A sequestrated generation can only define its own way which is nothing other than a declaration of its existence. It is clear that no one can stand for himself; it needs as to vegetable yams fiber, a support. This support refers to others: the ego and to close, the alter ego. That’s why in our life, we must reserve a quota of faith to measure our service and our servitude to reach the pantheon of our History, our record-honors. That is where it’s our history.
At the time when the September 11, 2001 empowers the fight against terrorists, the world gave reasons for such country’s leaders as Bush to tracking terrorists. Basically ignorance took precedence over all, because it was at that real time that the entire world legitimized the hunt for witches which victims where poor countries fighting for their peace and sovereignty. Iraq as well as Afghanistan was under tracks. But today, there is no indication that the terrorists were hunted and captured or that Bin Laden and the Taliban are out of terrorism.
Ironically and as the reality usually comes late, the result nowadays is still a counterfeit as in the case of Captain Dreyfus that the French State hundred years later, recognized his innocence since he was convicted.
The history is proving that the real terrorists have been George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Ariel Sharon, and Ehud Olmert who peacefully are enjoying the rest of their life without being harassed or pursued to the International criminal court which is actually devoted for Africans and the poorest leaders of the third world whose for some, seek for freedom and autonomy for their people.
The history rather than being story of the real fact describing what had happened before us, what is happening at the time we are, is a weapon to draw world maps as shaped by the conquistadors and the imperialists.
History is not a victory upon knowledge for real causes, events and realities witnessing the existence on this earth. It is a counterfeit, a crime against knowledge, a dehumanization of the human being species. As science, it is a war against civilization, a conflict of existence opposing falsification of the reality and real testimony.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire